Advice for Virtual Leadership: ‘Listen and Be Courageous’

BY Stephen Koepp | August 27, 2020

How can business leaders practice classic methods like management-by-walking-around, engaging closely with workers, when everyone has to keep their distance? Can “remote leadership” be as effective as the in-person kind? We are finding out. Managers are adapting as fast as they can. Tacy Byham, CEO of DDI, heads a global leadership-consulting firm that helps organizations hire, promote and develop leaders. From Day One talked with her about the keys to success in virtual leadership. Exceprts:

From Day One: In this vast new experiment we're having with remote work, what are some of the new challenges for leaders?

Tacy Byham: Leaders need to understand how to optimize leadership in a virtual environment. They need to understand how to maintain morale and engagement. They need to understand how to help their teams stay strong under pressure and under stress and avoid burnout. Employees will have a variety of responses. On the one hand, some workers can be exhilarated because they don’t like to meet to people face to face. But on the other hand, you can have loneliness, isolation, difficulties communicating and collaborating, and then a ton of distractions.

So it's quite a pivot that leaders have to do. It's very different from walking down the hall and being able to interact with people. The good thing is technology. We certainly never could have done this five years ago. The more you dive in and use all the features and opportunities that technology can provide, the easier the transition is going to be.

You mentioned burnout. Who are the prime candidates for that, and what are the prime causes?

It’s increasing demands on individuals, particularly if you're a in a high-performing role or in a function like technology. That’s where people can be burnt out–and on their way out. Back in 2018, Gallup did a survey and found that two thirds of full-time workers experienced burnout on the job. Wow! And that was in 2018.

What it comes down to is both individual factors and organizational factors. On the individual side, we have the overachievers, the Type A's, the people who say, ‘I'll just fit that in.’ And they're more likely to burn out than others. One the organizational side, we’ve worked with a researcher and found the top stressors. No. 1 is poor leadership. No. 2 is lack of organizational caring. No. 3 is the negativity of coworkers. This just gives you an idea of the top three. Another one is poor communication. Since we’re all working virtually, that one is probably rising up higher on the list.

Besides the challenges of remote work, what are some of the advantages of what we’ve discovered about people’s adaptability, as well as the new tools and techniques for working?

One of the advantages that I'm seeing is that we are breaking up the preconceived notion that an individual had to be geographically located near your office to be on a team. So the talent pool is broader and richer than it's ever been. It just breaks up and takes down barriers. We've proven that we can do things virtually.

Another advantage is employee development and a focus on growth. Which, of course, for an individual, is an engagement factor: What's my career path? Where am I going? How are you helping me grow with respect to assignments and opportunities? Informal learning does not need to end in a virtual world.

Tacy Byham, CEO of the global leadership consulting firm DDI (Photo courtesy of DDI)

A big part of our business has been helping new leaders step up to take on new roles. In fact, we pivoted 12 years ago to offering training in a virtual environment. I would say pre-COVID, about 20% of our leadership training worldwide was in the virtual classroom and 80% face-to-face. Now those numbers have completely flipped.

Is the virtual classroom as effective as live training?

In fact, we have recent success stories that people are more engaged and got more from learning in a virtual environment than when we were still doing it live. I would say it’s because we've designed virtual learning to require focused attention. You're actually very much engaged and involved.

We make sure that we follow the principles of behavior modeling. Let’s say you're learning to delegate. You will see some positive and negative examples associated with that. We break down what delegation is: recognizing the opportunities for you to delegate, having the delegation conversations, making sure that you follow up and provide the right support.

And then we actually have people practice. Anytime people actually practice something, it helps them to gain confidence and competence in that skill. I equate it to my son learning to drive the car when he was 16. He passed the written test. He played video games about driving. But you don't just hand him the car keys. You get in the car and help him practice.

You’ve also developed a virtual-reality inclusion experience. What is that like?

You go through the experience, you're trying to pitch your idea and other people are talking over you. Other people are interrupting you. You can see that there's an in-group and an out-group. It's full of microaggressions. If you just listen to the whole thing, it is amazing, the memorability of it. You could talk till you’re blue in the face about how women don't always have a voice at the table. But when people experience it, they get it.

We call it the empathy-generating machine. Because when you step into that, you really understand what it feels like. We’ve had men who said, ‘I know I've done that, and I am now so remorseful and apologetic,’ and it's a wake-up call around that. We've had women who've said, ‘I never realized I realized that was happening to my peers, I will do better to help them.’ But we've also had underrepresented women who have said, ‘Oh, my God, that is my life,’ and they broke into tears. So it's the experience itself–and then what do you do with it? So after that, we teach what inclusion really should be. We teach what ally roles are associated with that. We help people practice.

It's very powerful. And it's really safe. You're able to simulate the conversation and the feelings and all of that, but you’re doing it on your own. It’s okay to make mistakes.

Once people have those insights, now can they put inclusivity into action?

Technology is an incredible way to help with inclusivity. Virtual facilitators can work in ways that help quiet people have a voice at the table to share their incredible ideas. Also, I love things like virtual whiteboards, such as the Miro Board, to share and develop ideas as a team.

It takes preparation to be inclusive. Facilitators need to plan time for interactive discussions. For example, each participant would draw a pitch deck for an idea, then they would import their ideas right into the virtual white board. After that, the facilitator offers a voting exercise for the team to share which ideas they like and ask questions. This gives structure to the team’s discussion. It removes situations where someone is put directly on the spot. Instead, you’re collecting everybody's best ideas. It really creates a sense of inclusivity, which is vital because people want to feel like they have a voice.

How can a remote leader strike a balance between providing support for workers and  maintaining expectations on productivity?

You know, it's funny, I was having a social-distancing walk with a friend and she said that before COVID-19, she was only able to get approval to work at home once a week, on Fridays. Her commute was not easy. She said, ‘I loved being home on Fridays. And I was always accountable on my team and all that, but it was literally a fear of management that people would not be productive if they weren't able to see them.’”

And we flipped all that. As a leader with your team, you need to have a clear set of OKRs [objectives and key results] that cascade down to your team members. Then, if you as a team member are meeting the results, I am able to give you the freedom you need to get your work done. And I think that's what people are craving.

My chief legal officer has two little kids at home. She has to help them with online learning for the next nine weeks, so there is going to be times where she is going to have to step away. Yet I know what her objectives and key results are, so I don't really care how she manages her day. And that makes her super happy to know that she has that much trust and freedom. You can give people the freedom and that will help lead to their gratitude and engagement. And take away some of the burnout, by the way.

What advice would you give to new leaders taking the first steps in management in a workplace that's virtual?

If you're a newly minted leader, I would make sure you're clear on what you want to accomplish in the first 90 days. And it starts with a discussion with your manager who has promoted you. I would want to frankly know, ‘OK, you looked at a number of individuals and you selected me. What do you see as my strengths? What do you see as my watch-outs?’ Because you want to know that what you're bringing to the table and understand your responsibilities and accountabilities directly from your manager. We included a helpful interview guide in our book Your First Leadership Job: How Catalyst Leaders Bring Out the Best in Others, for you to have that conversation with your manager.

Once when I was newly promoted, I decided to write a one-pager on me, a personal mission statement to share with the team. I had made several moves within the organization, but coming back to supervise my old department, there was a fixed image of me from eight years ago. I got the idea of the one-pager from Doug Conant, formerly the CEO of Campbell Soup.

My one-pager included how I like to work and what you can expect from me. For one thing, I want a pulse of what's happening with people around the office. So I had to make people on my team aware of that, so they didn't read anything into it negatively.

How have your own leadership methods evolved during this multi-faceted crisis?

Technology has helped us so much. I don't think I have ever used the team chat as much as I have done. And you've got multiple channels open. For example, I found out that Annie on our team, who is just a rock star, had moved from Toronto to Montreal and she’s super busy. So I just reached out to her and suggested we have a virtual cocktail some night. In the past, I might have sent an email or whatever, but I think the instant gratification that you can get from this creates a way to for people to have those good social connections.

One other tip: the best, best meeting practice is that I've set my meetings to be 25-minute meetings and 50-minute meetings. It used to be because I needed walking time to get back and forth between meeting rooms. Now we still need a break.

With overlapping crises in terms of health, economy and social justice affecting workers, how would you advise leaders to talk about these things with their workers?

Now more than anything–in fact, Michelle Obama said it–we need empathy. But you need to get comfortable with the uncomfortable and actually have the conversations. So, step into it.

Facilitate an open dialogue. You can actually bring in an external facilitator if you don't feel up to it. But not talking about something makes it worse, in my opinion, so I would step in and have those conversations.

Also, as leaders you need to open your minds. You have to look at things from a different perspective. I'm listening to White Fragility, which I can't believe I never did before, when I take my walks around the neighborhood right now. And man, that's eye-opening.

Talk to your teenagers. College-age students are so tapped into the challenges today. You can learn from them. Even if you don't feel like even channeling your own concerns with the people you lead, you could say, ‘Well, my son thinks this,’ and that's a safe way to step into it. So again: broaden your thinking, listen and be courageous–and have the conversations.

Steve Koepp is a co-founder of From Day One. Previously, he was editorial director of Time Inc. Books, executive editor of Fortune and deputy managing editor of Time


RELATED STORIES

Sharing Their Truths: Working Parents Reveal the Benefits That Matter Most

Each year, HR leaders ask themselves: What benefits do my employees want? And what will provide me the most ROI? But many are left without answers.In a recent survey of 2,000 working parents conducted by Ovia Health, 62% said that their employers are not family friendly enough.The need for family friendly benefits is clear. Additionally, 94% said family benefits are a top priority and 73% said they would consider making a lateral move to another organization that offered better benefits and a family-friendly culture.In a From Day One webinar, Corrinne Hobbs, general manager and vice president, employer market organization at Ovia Health, discussed the results of the survey. Hobbs offered insight on current benefits offerings, where more support is needed, and what matters most to employees. Family Benefits That Match Today’s Culture“Women’s health benefits are one of the fastest growing segments within healthcare,” Hobbs said.  This is due to changing circumstances during and post-pandemic as more and more workers experienced shifting work-life balance due to hybrid schedules. It’s also due to the increasing range of types of families that need to be accounted for as lifestyles become more diverse. In this current marketplace, “employees have more control and more power than they have had in the past,” said moderator Siobhan O’Connor, chief content officer at Atria Institute. Therefore, it’s even more critical that employers make sure these specific needs are being served.While most companies do offer some family benefits, Hobbs says, there is often a disconnect between perceived needs and actual needs of employees. “There’s a strong push for employees to have better fertility benefits in their workplace. And 38% of respondents said that they’re looking for their employer to provide alternate family planning support,” Hobbs said. This is especially true with more and more single by choice or LGBTQIA+ parents in the workforce, and an overall trend of people waiting until later in life to have children. Unfortunately, many workplaces do not offer benefits to cover the costs of these services, which can be exorbitant.Siobhan O'Connor of Atria Institute interviewed Corrinne Hobbs of Ovia Health during the webinar on family-friendly benefits (photo by From Day One)Incorporating these benefits helps build an overall inclusive corporate culture and can be a way to help retain senior level female employees. Additionally, 83% of respondents said that perimenopausal or menopausal symptoms affect their ability to work, but only 1% receive benefits to help with those symptoms, says Hobbs. In order to “make sure that whatever you’re providing is equitable and inclusive all around,” a diverse range of age and gender must also be factors incorporated into a comprehensive benefits plan.Providing Better Family BenefitsWith family benefits top of mind for employees, Hobbs says there is a clear way forward for organizations looking to provide better care. The most important, according to respondents, is family leave. Hobbs advises: “Make sure that it’s paid, that it’s for at least four months, that it’s inclusive to both parents and that you don’t have to dip into your sick leave or your PTO before taking leave. That is a stress factor for many.” And employers must account for alternate pathways to parenthood, such as adoption, which might entail different costs or timeframes, she says.Hobbs says employers should not only plan for parental leave, but also for parental return. One way to do this is by setting up a return-to-work program to make it easier for parents to re-enter the workforce, noting that it’s a smarter investment than having to endure the cost of hiring someone new. Gradual part-time schedules can ease the burden on stressed parents, as can accommodating PTO policies, flex time, and hybrid or work from home options.Additionally, managers need to be prepped on how to work with returning parents. “A manager training program to ensure a family friendly workplace and ensure that people are able to bring their full selves to work without fear of repercussions is critical,” Hobbs said. ERG support groups can also provide a sense of community support within the workplace.Incorporating Digital Healthcare and AdvocacyOvia Health uses predictive analytics to power millions of members’ care and engagement with their health. Such apps can help provide crucial education about health symptoms, Hobbs says. For example, 85% of respondents said they don’t know much about menopause and how it may affect their performance. Ovia can help fill that gap through online resources, and also provide peer support groups. “We have a community wall where people with uteruses can talk about symptoms together and really feel a sense of community and commonality with others who are going through some of the [same] things,” Hobbs said. Finally, Ovia can also match employees with proper treatment.Using health assessments and surveys, Ovia gets to know its users and can provide highly personalized information to current, expecting, or potential parents. Health alerts will pop up based on users’ reported symptoms, and the app even provides proactive healthcare outreach to guide users through any bumps on their fertility journey.“Digital solutions offer round the clock access, education, and opportunities to really delve deeper into topics,” Hobbs said. “And they also come with advocacy, helping you navigate and understand these complex situations.” The app accounts for a wide variety of families and lifestyles, helping employers provide better care to a diverse workforce. “We have 50+ personalized clinical pathways and programs to support women and families, and then we personalize the experience for each member based on the dynamic health assessments and digital symptom report,” Hobbs said, describing the data-driven service as “person-centered care.”Hobbs says that while women have increasingly reached the upper echelons of the corporate world in recent years, women’s participation in the labor market is currently at a 33-year low. Having a family-friendly workplace can help ensure talented women stay on. “It costs upwards of $75,000 to replace an employee,” Hobbs said. By offering a diverse suite of benefits companies can retain top talent, encourage a more diverse workforce, and save money in the process.Editor's note: From Day One thanks our partner, Ovia Health, for sponsoring this webinar. Katie Chambers is a freelance writer and award-winning communications executive with a lifelong commitment to supporting artists and advocating for inclusion. Her work has been seen in HuffPost and several printed essay collections, among others, and she has appeared on Cheddar News, iWomanTV, and CBS New York.

Katie Chambers | April 10, 2024

How to Measure Employee Engagement and Spot Disengagement

When we think about engagement, we think about all of the different ways that we track engagement consciously and subconsciously. In some ways, we track engagement by just realizing things, like who’s on camera during meetings online, who has a green dot next to their name, and who has a yellow dot next to their name. These are all of the different ways to subconsciously track engagement, but there are biases in each observation because context is key. Just because a person is off camera doesn’t mean they’re less engaged. They might be in a crowded spot or have a background that’s distracting, so they’ve elected to be off-camera. Or maybe their WiFi just isn’t as strong as it needs to be on that particular day.Regardless of the industry or nature of business, maintaining a high level of team productivity is crucial, and disengagement can be a significant obstacle. Learning to recognize the signs of employee disengagement early is key to preventing its negative impact. In a recent From Day One webinar led by ActivTrak colleagues, Gabriella Mauch, VP of Productivity Lab, and Javier Aldrete, SVP of product, the speakers discussed how boosting self-awareness and manager coaching can help address disengagement before employees check out.Gabriela Mauch, pictured, led the webinar alongside colleague Javier Aldrete (company photo)We’re making all these subconscious assumptions about engagement because we know that engagement leads to great results, says Mauch. But disengagement, on the flip side, leads to harmful attrition. As such, it’s important that we find better ways to track engagement so that we can drive to a healthy work environment. Mauch shares that only 23% of employees are fully engaged in their work, leaving over 75% of employees at risk of disengagement. This can cost organizations a significant amount of money, both from an attrition standpoint, a knowledge management standpoint, and the productivity they’re not necessarily getting out of their business. The benefit of addressing employee disengagement is the ability to get a better return on workforce investments. Organizations can see up to 40% improvement in employee churn and burnout rates, plus an opportunity to gain 15% to 25% in productivity when disengagement is addressed effectively, says Mauch. “So often, disengagement and quiet quitting is a function of that individual not being properly aligned to their work, not being properly coached by their manager, or not being properly guided by their leadership team,” said Mauch. It’s  important to learn how to use insights to better inform leaders, managers, and individuals to be more thoughtful about productivity and more engaged in the work being done. As such, it’s important to have measurable indicators into our work environment. This means understanding when we have individuals performing with low focus, low working hours, and perhaps very passive participation. It doesn’t necessarily mean that the individual doesn't want to be working. Instead, there’s an opportunity to coach and guide the employee to work the right way, on the right things, at the right time. Mauch encourages employers to be thoughtful about employee behavior as a helpful indicator of engagement. This means observing things like people coming into the office, badging in, and leaving two hours later merely to show their faces. This could be because while they are expected to be in office, they might actually be more productive at home. The final thing to note is whether or not employees are making the impact you expect them to be making. Here are some questions to ask: Are they putting in the productivity that you would expect? Are you getting the output that you expect to earn, and are you ultimately getting the revenue that you would expect? By collecting insights on an ongoing basis, you can gain a level of understanding of engagement on an ongoing basis. Additionally, leaders need to identify the factors that are contributing to employee disengagement and quiet quitting in their particular context, as well as invest in measures to improve them.Editor's note: From Day One thanks our partner, ActivTrak, for sponsoring this webinar. Keren's love for words saw her transition from a corporate employee into a freelance writer during the pandemic. When she is not at her desk whipping up compelling narratives and sipping on endless cups of coffee, you can find her curled up with a book, playing with her dog, or pottering about in the garden.

Keren Dinkin | April 09, 2024

The Gender Penalty: Addressing Workplace Inequity

Studies show that despite recent movements for equal pay, no significant gender pay gap has been made in the last two decades. Women are still earning less than men, with some variance as high as 22%.But the discrimination extends far beyond just the pay gap: from childbirth to menopause, women are also discriminated against for their life choices and in some cases, life stages, with  42% of working women reporting facing gender discrimination at their workplace.In a From Day One webinar, Lydia Dishman, senior editor of growth and engagement at Fast Company, moderated a discussion among women in roles of leadership on how to achieve equality in the workplace.Studies show that women are 41% more likely to experience toxic workplace culture than men, underlining the need for a culture revamp in companies.According to recent research, one in three working parents stated they lacked access to a reliable workplace lactation location. The disparity shows that offering solutions is far more than checking off boxes, Teresa Hopke, CEO of Talking Talent said.“Having a pumping room is a checkbox. So even if we check the box and we get the right rooms and accommodations for people, that’s not going to move the needle in the way that we need to in terms of the systemic change that needs to take place,” Hopke said.For change, both workers and leaders need to be actively working to create the shift that they need, Hopke says.Speakers from Talking Talent and KPMG joined moderated Lydia Dishman in a discussion about the role of gender in the workplace (photo by From Day One)“There is some hard work that organizations need to do to create the right culture with the right mindsets, behaviors, conditions, and structures that will support women as they advance through their careers,” Hopke said. “There is also work that women need to do to articulate their needs and not suffer in silence when the load gets too hard.”When asked about allyship, seventy-seven percent of white employees consider themselves allies to women of color. However, far fewer replied to actively participating in allyship, with only 39 percent stating they confront discrimination when they see it, and 21 percent stating they advocate for new opportunities for women of color.“If you are not taking any of those ally actions regularly, you’re not moving things forward in a positive way,” Marcee Harris Schwartz, director of diversity, equity, and inclusion at KPMG, said. “We have to think about how we activate allyship whether that’s taking someone under your wing who comes from a different background or experiences so that it has an impact.”When asked about biases at work, 83% of employees stated that the biases they experienced were subtle and indirect. In one work case, Renu Sachdeva, head of client solutions at Talking Talent, found this to be true.“We asked leaders to pick people to actively sponsor who belonged to these identity groups. And when the results came back in, we found a majority of them had selected white women, the next most selected group was men of color, and the least selected group was women of color,” Sachdeva said.The findings weren’t surprising, Sachdeva says. Research has found that white people demonstrate a clear bias for other white people, affecting workplace processes from hiring to promotion. Challenging biases is key to moving allyship in the right direction, Sachdeva said.“If you’re talking about the majority, corporate America is usually white men in most organizations, so the highest level of comfort tends to be with white women because there’s a relational aspect to it,” Sachdeva said. “But with intentionality, we need to consciously choose to connect with [different] people to mentor, sponsor or be an ally to because that’s usually the group that gets the most overlooked and left behind.”Editor’s note: From Day One thanks our partner, Talking Talent, for sponsoring this webinar.Wanly Chen is a writer and poet based in New York City.

Wanly Chen | April 08, 2024