How Can You Manage Human Capital If You’re Not Developing It First?

BY Emily McCrary-Ruiz-Esparza | March 06, 2023

Eighty-three percent of HR leaders say that lacking the right tech tools makes their job challenging, according to the Society of Human Resource Management. Many HR professionals are looking for quality over quantity in their tech stacks, but they’re getting only the latter.

At From Day One’s conference in Atlanta, Kristy McCann Flynn, the CEO and co-founder of SkillCycle, an employee-development platform, gave a presentation in which she urged employers to take inventory of their HR tech tools and identify what’s helpful and what’s not, and with that newly freed budget, reinvest it into the workforce. 

The systems we have in place today to manage our people were built the wrong way, slowly over time, and have become unmanageable, she asserted. Flynn, who has spent two decades working in HR, sympathized with professionals who feel overwhelmed by the tools they’re expected to use, often a clumsy mix of applicant tracking systems, survey tools, learning and development platforms, benefits engines, and engagement software. In fact, HR can find a tool for just about anything it needs to get done, but those tools don’t always connect, and switching channels constantly is draining.

Flynn believes corporate priorities need an adjustment. “We’ve been incentivizing work-life success backward for decades, leading with the end goal of performance management and not with data and development to drive performance outcomes. To fix this mess, we must address the root cause and develop talent before managing it. We must prioritize human capital development to truly manage human capital,” she said.

Information Overload

Kristy McCann Flynn, CEO and co-founder of SkillCycle (Company photo)

Every HR tool is designed to collect information about a company’s workforce, or even its potential workforce, but much of it goes unused. Employees may participate in engagement surveys or give feedback when asked, but then they never see anything change, or they don’t get the help they need. “Why would you give somebody feedback and collect all this data and then essentially do nothing with that?” said Flynn.

HR and people operations have the information they need, according to Flynn, they just lack the capability to reinvest in their workers and “[bring] it to our people to give them the skills and the ability to do their jobs.”

She advised putting the data to good use for employee enrichment in the form of personalized development programs “to solve the skill issues so HR and organizations are playing offense instead of defense.”

By cleaning house and consolidating tools, Flynn said, money that was previously tied up in unhelpful HR tools can then be reinvested into developing the workforce. She recommended “[putting] all the talent and development and learning together in one epicenter to be able to drive the outcomes that you need for your organization.”

And with fewer tools, HR can spend more time on the human-centric work of the job. “Tech is not a replacement. Tech is an enablement,” said Flynn. “We need to keep that human-centric component because our entire job revolves around people, and unless we all get botted-up, there’s always going to be people. It’s about playing offense and being proactive and taking data and development and bringing it together in a core for people to get the outcomes that they need.”

Editor’s note: From Day One thanks our partner, SkillCycle, who sponsored this thought leadership spotlight.

Emily McCrary-Ruiz-Esparza is a From Day One contributing editor and freelance reporter who covers the future of work, HR, recruiting, DEI, and women's experiences in the workplace. Her work has appeared in the Washington Post, Fast Company, Quartz at Work, and Digiday’s Worklife, among others.


RELATED STORIES

Unlocking Gen Z’s Potential by Nurturing Engagement and Aligning Values

Generation Z entered a workforce unlike that of past generations. Not only did many of them complete their final years of university during the pandemic, separated from their peers and completing coursework in solitude, they also entered a workforce indelibly changed by remote work, rapid globalization of business, and proliferating tech.As the share of Gen Z in the workforce grows, employers are eager to recruit and retain these young workers, yet they may find themselves stumped for ways to attract, engage, and motivate them.“They’re looking for companies that aren’t going to use them and abuse them, but are rather going to give them what they feel that their worth is,” said Rachel Schonwald, senior marketing campaign manager at HR tech platform HiBob. That means respecting their boundaries and the hours they’re working, and giving them professional development opportunities.”I spent time with Schonwald recently for a From Day One webinar, titled “Unlocking Gen Z’s Potential by Nurturing Engagement and Aligning Values.” She shared the best ways to engage Gen Z and HiBob’s latest data on the workforce’s youngest demographic.Loyalty Is Tenuous for Today’s Youngest WorkersPeople of all generations are less likely these days to spend a decade with a single company or even in a single industry. But for Gen Z, tenure is remarkably short. According to HiBob’s own data, one-third of Gen Z respondents said they’re planning to leave their job within two years, Schonwald said. And unlike their older peers, they’re ready to jump ship without a new job lined up.If they don’t get what they want at work, they’re willing to look for it elsewhere. “They don’t have this long-term career path in mind. They’re still at the beginning, and they’re still experimenting,” Schonwald said.Finding More Purpose and MeaningSo, what will make them stay?More than the generations before then, Gen Z wants meaningful work. In fact, HiBob found that 42% of Gen Zers satisfied with their jobs joined their company because of its impact and mission. HiBob’s own research found that shared values is a top reason that Gen Z is likely to work for a company. But companies aren’t able to satisfy the values of every worker they employ.Journalist Emily McCrary-Ruiz-Esparza interviewed Rachel Schonwald of HiBob during the webinar on Gen Z (photo by From Day One)“The reality is, not every corporation is a nonprofit,” Schonwald said. “However, I do think that there are a lot of different opportunities for organizations to align with those values or show their shared values, be it the work they do or the product or the output your company brings.”Some companies will be able to satisfy that need for meaning with their internal programs. “We saw a much higher proportion of Gen Z was satisfied with their workplace when they had diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging programming. Specifically, LGBTQ+ programming.”Publish information and data on your programs both internally and externally, Schonwald said. “You want to make sure that everybody within the organization knows that you have those, and you also want to attract and recruit young talent by showcasing it.”Gen Z Wants Opportunities for AdvancementIn addition to meaningful work and a place to belong, Gen Z is looking for an employer that will invest in their careers. Twenty-seven percent of Gen Z respondents told HiBob that a lack of a clear career path is what they most dislike about their current job.Young workers today are also eager to advance. “If you ask somebody early in their career, they’re going to want a promotion every six months,” Schonwald said. “I mean, who doesn’t want a promotion and a raise every six months?” But that’s not realistic, so set expectations early, showing them ways they might grow within your organization and the benchmarks they need to achieve.“Having that transparency will go a long way,” Schonwald said. “When you have something you’re working toward, usually you’ll see a lot more productivity, and you’re going to see better results because there’s a path.”But don’t limit those paths to upward ones. This generation is far more open to the “career lattice” in which moves might be upward, lateral, or even across departments. “We’ve had no stability,” she said of the ways the workplace has changed in the last five years. “The thing that we know now is that change is constant. That’s very different from what people entering the workforce 20 years ago experienced.”Zoomers Crave Workplace RelationshipsMany opportunities for advancement are won through who you know, and employers can facilitate career-building networks Gen Z wants with mentorship and sponsorship programs.“We see higher satisfaction levels within Gen Z when there are formal mentorship programs at their company,” Schonwald said. Thirty-seven percent of Gen Zers who are dissatisfied with their current employer say they get only informal mentorship opportunities, and more than 50% of satisfied Zoomers say they get formal mentorship opportunities, according to the company’s data.Gen Z, perhaps overfamiliar with remote work and digital-only relationships, is looking for a face-to-face experience: 41% of Gen Z told HiBob that they feel more engaged while working in the office than when they work remotely. In fact, more than one-third of respondents said what they most dislike about the job is that there aren’t enough opportunities to build relationships with colleagues.If you have the time and money to fly everyone into company HQ periodically, by all means do so, “but there are always great opportunities for finding digital ways to bring people together, whether that’s through ERGs, mentorship groups, or interest groups.  HiBob, which is headquartered in New York, created “villages,” where workers in close proximity around the country will take a half-day and get together. “They’re across all different functions and all different levels, and that contributes to creating a village, meeting new people, and having those connections that you wouldn’t normally have. But it absolutely needs executive sponsorship, be it from HR or whoever is the most senior person in that area.”The Changing Demographics of the WorkforceMcKinsey estimates that Gen Z will constitute more than 25% of the workforce by next year. And as the Baby Boomers age out of the workforce and into retirement, the power they wield will grow.This will require employers to make significant adjustments to recruitment and working styles, Schonwald said. “Now’s the time where we can start to recognize, influence, and inform other people to make the changes that we need in order to accommodate Gen Z entering the workforce. And what they’re looking for is a little bit different.”Editor’s note: From Day One thanks our partner HiBob for sponsoring this webinar.Emily McCrary-Ruiz-Esparza is a freelance journalist and From Day One contributing editor who writes about work, the job market, and women’s experiences in the workplace. Her work has appeared in the BBC, The Washington Post, Quartz, Fast Company, and Digiday’s Worklife.

Emily McCrary-Ruiz-Esparza | March 15, 2024

​​Using Structured Hiring to Make the Process Smoother at Every Stage

Hiring isn’t an exact science, but it should be. “If you can quickly, predictably bring on the best talent you can solve most business problems. That's basically the best weapon you can have in business," said President and Co-founder of Greenhouse, Jon Stross, in a recent From Day One webinar.Stross would know. He was once tasked with hiring local editors for Baby Center (a site that reaches over 32 million users per month) in 20 different countries. To do so efficiently and successfully, he and his team perfected a process by which they could “find people, interview them, test their skills and local language, then hire, onboard, and manage them.”“Hiring is so critical to the success of the business. And yet, [companies] are showing up so poorly in the hiring process. And we said if we could solve that, if we could help companies become great at hiring.”The interview process in most instances can be messy. Interviewers go in with a résumé and general idea of what they are subjectively looking for but no consistent outline of the ideal employee that fits a certain role. Stross says this often leads to duplicative and biased interview questions and bad candidate experiences.For structured hiring, Stross says, “the idea that you come up with a shared understanding of what it would take to succeed in this role? What are the characteristics of somebody who will succeed in this role?”“So you say, okay, we’re going to test these three skills and this one interview, we’re going to test these three behaviors. And so you’re able to come up with a consistent process that every candidate goes through,” Stross said. The idea is to create a consistent, transparent process that the interviewer can repeat with each candidate, and one that the candidate also understands.To achieve a more ideal hiring experience within the structured hiring model, Greenhouse, Stross's platform, achieves synchronicity between the hiring manager and recruiter by getting them to think about the role they’re filling – job requirements, metrics by which to measure them, people in the company who are already succeeding in the role, and more. Next they develop a "scorecard" to test the candidates capabilities, then structure the stages they'll put the candidates through to test various skills and attributes.Jon Stross of Greenhouse was interviewed by journalist Kelly Bourdet on the topic of structured hiring Session moderator Kelly Bourdet, founder of Apparata Media and the former managing editor of CNN Business, pointed out the established culture of hiring and interviewing and how there is some difficulty in navigating that mindset.“You might have some leader who’s been hiring for 20 years, or somebody who says, 'I have X-ray vision, I can just tell if somebody's good,'” Stross said. To overcome this, they point out the often inordinate amount of time companies spend on recruiting and ask them to spend a little more. “If you’re going to ask for all of your interviewer’s time, asking them to step away from what they’re normally doing, the least you can do is help prepare them.”He says there’s always resistance to new ideas amongst management but other managers in other departments might be open to it. “Start with the people who go, 'Yeah, this totally makes sense to me,' and you work with them.” Once management sees the benefit, others tend to fall in line.The other thing that usually helps is when seasoned interviewers see that structured hiring actually makes their job easier. “It’s going to give me exactly what questions to ask? I don’t have to think at all” I can just spend my time focusing on the candidate and not thinking of the next questions?" Stross said.Though it sounds like a broken record to point out that the professional world is changing, and AI is driving a lot of that change, it remains true. The roles we’re looking for today may last only five years, so the skills and attributes a company is looking for are more along the lines of adaptability – someone who can “roll with the punches.”Structured hiring can play an important role in shaping the hiring process away from what Stross calls "diffuse, amorphous interviews where people just ask questions about personal tastes." He points to use cases with ChatGPT and other AI, where there are obvious cases, non obvious (but profound) cases, and some "dicey" ones. Given that ChatGPT is adept at writing content, it can be used to write job descriptions, interview questions, and scorecard attributes.On the bias concern, Stross alludes to the legislation happening in New York and Europe, “You need to be transparent about how you’re making decisions. And the answer is I don’t know, the machine told us. That’s not gonna go over. It's not a great answer, right.”Stross says that for the most part, when bias slips in it’s not intentional. When making decisions without any sort of criteria, “it’s much easier for the bias to slip in.”Stross highlights the fact that Greenhouse started with a few hundred employees and now has 10,000, and went from one office to being all over the world. And everywhere you go, he says people invent their own process for everything.Hiring and managing an office are no different. “What we find is that without structured hiring, things can get messy quickly. And when you get international, each country invents their own thing. Now, obviously, you’re always going to have something unique about each country.” He says that even within Greenhouse their local offices are going to have cultures that are unique to where they are, but there are core values found in every office.“There is a lot of bedrock that we want to be the same across each place. And so one of the secrets of structured interviewing is that it’s a way to tell your internal employees what you’re all about. What are the values that we care about? You can inculcate the company values in the hiring process.”Editor's note: From Day One thanks our partner, Greenhouse, for sponsoring this webinar.Matthew Koehler is a freelance journalist and licensed real estate agent based in Washington, DC. His work has appeared in Greater Greater Washington, The Washington Post, The Southwester, and Walking Cinema, among others.

Matthew Koehler | March 11, 2024

How DEI Must Evolve: Highlighting the Challenges and Opportunities

In the past year, big corporations like Target and Bud Light both faced backlash for their DEI initiatives, and states like Texas and Florida have even implemented bans to curb the expansion of DEI in higher education. DEI is facing a tough challenge in the nation.The pushback isn’t a surprise to Y-Vonne Hutchinson, CEO of diversity and inclusion product and services firm, ReadySet.“We’re seeing backsliding in those areas of DEI but I always tell people not to be surprised when that happens,” said Hutchinson. “We tend to think of progress as a linear advancement when in reality, it’s more of a push-pull and we have to be prepared for that resistance.”In a conversation with From Day One’s co-founder Steve Koepp, Hutchinson discussed the current challenges and opportunities in DEI, and how companies can continue to progress.Relabeling DEI While Remembering the Core ValuesDespite recent backlash, company leaders are still committed to DEI initiatives. Some leaders have audited their initiatives to ensure no legal risks, while others have rebranded and continued their initiatives more discreetly. When rebranding DEI initiatives, Hutchinson reminds company leaders to stay focused on the core of the problem.“Relabeling is helpful but I think that we have to be careful and we have to still call things what they are,” Hutchinson said. “Language like belonging, inclusion, accessibility is great but I get nervous when companies steer clear of naming some of the very foundational issues that they’re trying to solve because it makes it harder for them to do so. For example, racism still exists but if you rename racism then you have to figure out how to solve those problems without creating a perception that you’re being unfair to other groups.”Utilizing DEI as a Tool to Problem SolveIn the workplace, being diverse, equitable, and inclusive were long problems before the recent attention DEI had received. Hutchinson points to meritocracy as a key example of the clash of diversity and equitability.Y-Vonne Hutchinson of ReadySet was interviewed in the thought leadership spotlight (photo by From Day One)“Meritocracy has never existed when it comes to working in a company. Most people come into organizations through things like referrals and most people’s networks are homogenous,” Hutchinson said. “Even if we were to strip away traditional DEI programs, we would not revert to a meritocracy. Instead, we would be deeply entrenched in those hiring problems that were already there and have fewer tools to solve them.”To be effective in DEI efforts, leaders need to first identify the problem they want to solve, Hutchinson says. “DEI is a toolkit meant to address specific, deeply entrenched problems, and it's evolving,” Hutchinson said. “When we think about the future of DEI, focus on the problem first and specifically name some of these issues that organizations are going to have to deal with, no matter what happens in the DEI space.”Acknowledging Long-Term Effects of the Pandemic on the WorkforceThe pandemic did more than drastically change the style of working; it also left lingering effects that directly impacted workers’ health.In a study on workers’ claims and the impact of Long Covid, researchers found nearly 18% of claimants with long Covid were unable to return to work for over one year, with most claimants under 60 years of age.“We’re seeing people who are sick more often, more instances of chronic illness, more instances of disability,” Hutchinson said. “Traditionally, our tools that were relying on our old school tools, such as sick days, but over time it is not going to serve us. We’re gonna see more labor shortages, more attrition, lower productivity and I think that’s going to have a real impact on our bottom lines.”Leaders must be able to recognize the impact long Covid has on their workforce and be willing to take measures to protect and include those that are directly affected, Hutchinson says.“The best thing that companies can do now is critically think about accessibility and disability inclusion, and how they're going to make those accommodations for their workforce.”Editor's note: From Day One thanks our partner, ReadySet, for sponsoring this thought leadership spotlight. Wanly Chen is a writer and poet based in New York City.

Wanly Chen | March 05, 2024