Lessons of Boeing’s Cultural Decline–and How It Can Recover 

BY Jennifer Haupt | May 01, 2022

Boeing, a creator of the jet age, was once seen as a prestigious American corporate icon. Yet the company’s relationships with employees, investors, and business partners went into a tailspin after its merger with rival McDonnell Douglas in 1997. That’s the thesis of journalist Peter Robison, author of Flying Blind: The 737 MAX Tragedy and the Fall of Boeing, who spoke at a From Day One conference in Seattle about how this revered corporation went astray by neglecting some of its original core values, and what other companies can learn from this cautionary tale.

“The conflict ensued almost immediately with a strike that was the largest white-collar strike in U.S. history at the time,” said Robison, an investigative reporter for Bloomberg and Bloomberg Businessweek. “A federal mediator talked with an engineer I also interviewed who said, ‘This company is doomed.’ The reason he gave was that on one side you had hunter- killer assassins, the McDonnell Douglas side, which was more stockholder focused, and on the Boeing side, you had boy scouts who were customer- and product-focused. So when you look at the Max tragedy, you have to look at the DNA that started with that merger. It had impacts that lasted that long,” he said in a fireside chat with Marissa Nall, staff reporter of the Puget Sound Business Journal.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) grounded the Boeing 737 MAX airliner worldwide between March 2019 and December 2020 after 346 passengers died in two crashes. This was the longest-ever grounding of a U.S. airliner, which cost Boeing an estimated $20 billion in fines, compensation and legal fees, with indirect losses of more than $60 billion from 1,200 cancelled orders. Engineering reviews uncovered design problems, and lawmakers investigated Boeing’s incentives to minimize pilot training for the aircraft.

Author Peter Robison (Photo courtesy of the author)

Nall asked about the impact of the merger on leadership and what that meant operationally for Boeing. “When you think of an aircraft, it's a product that has such a long product cycle, and decisions made at the management level filter down to the employee level,” said Robison, who conducted hundreds of hours of interviews with Boeing engineers. “Culture is a word that seems so amorphous, but it’s amazing how specific people get about it.” The culture of Boeing, he said, became all about “its schedule, its cost, its shareholder value. And that stems directly from the influence of some of the top leadership who came from McDonnell Douglas in the late 90s.”

Robison explained that the leadership focus was centered on cost containment. He looked at one engineer’s evaluation that said ideas are measured in dollars. Another engineer was given specific performance and time requirements tied to reducing costs. The culture became one stemming from the idea that corporate executives ultimately make the best decisions about allocating resources, and ultimately about safety. The leadership was under pressure from stockholders to reduce costs, and that trickled down to managers and their teams.

The compliance regulation of Boeing by the FAA lapsed, since the regulators were under pressure to cut costs as well, so both the FAA and Boeing were rewarded by stakeholders for speeding designs through production. This tension between Wall Street and the more product-focused engineers corroded the corporate culture that had defined Boeing in its heyday and helped to make the company so successful.

The good news is that Robison believes corporate America has learned something from the MAX tragedy. “In the late 90s, the Business Roundtable put out a statement and said, essentially, the shareholder is right and a company’s first duty is to the shareholder,” Robison said. “Everything else will take care of itself as long as the shareholders are rewarded. But in 2019, the roundtable revised that stance and said companies owe a duty to everyone, including customers, employees, and communities.”

And, Robison said, Boeing has shifted its business practices to reflect a closer alliance with its former corporate culture’s product focus. For example, Boeing's current CEO, David Calhoun, is getting weekly reports from his engineering team and there's a safety committee on its board.

So how does Boeing build back its credibility with both the airlines and the flying public? “I think that will take showing integrity,” Robison said. “Part of the reason that Boeing struggled so much with the MAX crisis was that there were multiple moments when it was found to be saying things that weren’t true. There was a moment I described in the book where Boeing was claiming after the first crash that it was maintenance errors. But pilots in America knew that was not the case. Boeing, both in public and behind closed doors, needs to show absolute integrity.”

Jennifer Haupt is a Seattle-based author and journalist.


RELATED STORIES

Crafting Employee Journeys with Career Growth in Mind

Today, employees crave transparent career growth in their organizations, with an overwhelming 73% stating that they want visibility about these opportunities. In contrast, 61% of employees are more likely to leave their jobs if there is no visibility, showing how career growth can have a direct impact on employee retention and engagement.For Hannah Lucille, vice president of people and culture at Warner Bros. Discovery, transparency on career growth needs to begin even before an employee enters the company.“Career expectations start as early as when recruiters reach out to candidates. Recruiters need to understand what these candidates’ career ambitions are and make sure that we’re feeding that back into all the conversations,” Lucille said.At From Day One’s Seattle conference, Lucille and other leaders joined From Day One’s co-founder Steve Koepp in a discussion on career growth, highlighting how leaders can effectively support employees in finding their next steps.Leaning into Mentorship, Networking, SponsorshipCareer growth often relates to tangible goals like promotions or upskilling. However, career growth is hard to exist without the invisible parts of career development, said Dave Wilkin, founder of Ten Thousand Coffees.85% of jobs are filled by networking, underlining the relationship of strong connections with future job opportunities. “Your network is your net worth. If we can create networks, we create more opportunities and more opportunity lattices,” Wilkin said.But knowing someone isn’t enough to get someone their next job or career movement, Wilkin said.“Competency around how to turn networks into impact is non-existent. To make opportunity happen, you need to create a conversation that turns connections into impact,” Wilkin said. “We want to make sure that when we’re creating conversation pathways, we’re being declarative on whether that relationship is a sponsorship, connection, or an onboarding buddy to help new hires accelerate.”The panelists spoke to the topic "How Career Growth Can Be a Part of Employee Experience from the Beginning" Relationships like mentorships and sponsorships can be beneficial to employees in navigating career growth and opportunities. In a study on mentorship, researchers found that while 76% of employees believe mentorship is important, only 36% had a mentor.To Ambra Benjamin, vice president of tech recruiting and operations at software company Datadog, debunking some common perceptions about mentorships can help people find those crucial relationships.“People look at mentorship and think they have to find a senior employee who’s at a place in their career that they’re not,” Benjamin said. “But my first and best mentor at Facebook was significantly more junior than me. He was having success, and I wasn’t, and I asked him to mentor me. Mentorship can just be helping you with a certain skill or an area where you’re not proficient and having someone more proficient than you be in that role.”Building a Safe Culture to Talk About Career GrowthLeaders who hold frequent check-ins with their employees on career growth opportunities can find themselves reaping the benefits. In one study, researchers found that 82% of employees who have career conversations with their manager more than once a month were highly engaged at work compared to 53% of those who only talk about their career once a year or less.Having conversations is only a part of the equation, Lucille says. To effectively support employees, leaders need to allow employees to discuss their career goals in a safe environment.“Verbalizing career growth sometimes can be pretty intimidating because people fear the repercussions of those conversations, thinking their managers won’t be as invested anymore or they won’t give them the top reward because they know they are looking for other opportunities,” Lucille said. “But it's important to build it into the culture with hiring managers to ask about career goals and make it a two-way conversation so that there's no surprises. We’re far more likely to be able to co-create another opportunity for employees that way.”For the first time five generations are in the workforce, signaling a change to traditional mindsets to career growth and the approach to conversations about career growth. To Roz Francuz-Harris, vice president of talent acquisition for real estate marketplace Zillow, leaders need to adapt their strategies accordingly.“One person’s question about those next steps is not the same with a different generational person but it doesn’t mean that their value is any less; it just means we all want the same things but ask those things are different,” Francuz-Harris said. “As HR professionals, we have to build a program for hiring managers to run this type of process to seek out career growth for their employees, and then help them navigate which avenues to find it.”Wanly Chen is a writer and poet based in New York City.

Wanly Chen | March 27, 2024

Workplace Inclusivity: From Initiative to Integration

For Madhuri Kumar, VP & global head of talent management at ChampionX, inclusion means “embedding inclusion across the lifecycle, which is inclusive hiring, onboarding, development, talent management—that is everybody has an equitable playing field to grow their careers.”Kumar, one of five speakers on a panel at From Day One’s Houston event, talked about the path forward for workplace inclusivity. For several years now, companies have been trying out DEI. But, as Kumar put it, “We are messy humans, trying to do the right thing.” The key is to keep trying, keep learning, and remember why you started in the first place. “This is not a sprint, it's a marathon. Let’s pace ourselves,” Kumar said. “It’s a journey we’re on.”The DEI JourneyIt may have started in various forms years ago, but the real push during the pandemic and civil unrest required companies to focus on what they were doing to either hinder or help their employees.“The last few years has raised the capability around the conversation,” said panelist Jill Ramshaw, VP of HR at Marathon Oil. DEI initiatives were the first focal point, which encouraged employees to be bold, she says. Marathon Oil has increased its ERGs as well. Support from leadership has helped everyone to open up even more.“These small group conversations help to really get under the surface and think through and work through things that people are not always comfortable talking about,” she added. At the core of success on the DEI journey is intentional planning, says Ramshaw. Companies don’t mandate change and expect everyone to fall in line. The ERGs help to bring the middle into play, and help leadership take note of what must change.“This top down, middle kind of approach helps with the integration,” she said.From Initiative to IntegrationIntegration, the panelists agreed, is the next step on the DEI journey. The trial and error of DEI over the past few years has proven valuable, but the move from initiative to integration is vital. Panelist Elise Smith, co-founder and CEO, of Praxis Labs says going from standalone DEI to embedded is key, especially when it comes to managers. “You can’t do a DEI training and then a separate manager training,” she said. “Being a manager is being a manager who leads with inclusion, who leads with a lens towards equity. We have moved away from the paradigm of those being two separate things.”In light of that expectation, it is the hardest time to be a manager. They are required to be more and do more for their employees and the company at large. Building those foundational skills that embed equity and inclusion into an employee experience is what will be vital for managers and companies moving forward.The panelists discussed the topic "DEI Will Endure, But Corporate Advocates Will Need to Reframe Their Approach" at From Day One's Houston conferenceFor one client, Smith said it was a great place to work with great feedback scores. However, they saw a dip in engagement across the board last year, especially for underrepresented groups. “What we found is that when their managers and their teams worked with us, they had a 10% higher engagement score, because these foundational skills are so core to people feeling seen, engaged, and able to bring their best to work,” Smith said. Panelists noted that the Millennial and Gen Z workforce will be a big part of making DEI part of the fabric of companies by the sheer nature of their perspectives on life. “They are choosing to work at places that are aligned to their values,” Smith said. She cited a recent study from Deloitte that found 1/3 of Gen Z and Millennials chose not to take a job because they didn’t feel like they were prioritizing DEI and the environment. Kumar agreed, “the new generation entering the workforce is going to help us really speed this work up because they're not going to accept anything less. So I truly believe that this work is about creating the workplace of the future.”Moving ForwardModerator Shelby Stewart of Essence asked this of the panelists: “when you all consider the current challenges and backlash against the DEI initiatives, are you in your companies likely to take your foot off the gas?”Panelist Mindy Fitzgerald, global director of diversity, culture and engagement at Air Products said DEI isn’t always popular with people, including their own employees. But the idea of DEI requires a total mind shift.“We’re not in this game to make friends. And we’re not in this game to be comfortable,” Fitzgerald said. “We’re in this because this is the right thing for our company to do.”Fitzgerald added: “What does diversity in 2025 or 2027 look like in a company? Where are employees of underrepresented groups of employees? What is their lived experience? What are we doing to meet their needs as employees?”Part of getting there requires a lot of transparency. At ChampionX, they started a Pipeline to CEO where employees can anonymously write directly to him, and he answers each one personally, then those discussions are published for everyone to see.“I believe it is a really powerful way through which he shows his ability to be humble, wanting to listen directly with no filters,” Kumar said.Panelist Lucho Vizcardo, head of international HR, Western Hemisphere at Nabors Industries said DEI has been an evolution for them. The more they learned, the stronger they could move forward with what worked. They continue to use ERGs and take initiatives globally so all can benefit. Learning has been key.“We didn’t have all the answers at the beginning,” he said. Now that DEI has matured, it’s taking that next step of integration, or in other words, belonging.“Belonging is where you try to integrate all the things that you learned and that worked, and try to become better as a company.”From future surveys, the feedback was loud and clear: they weren’t following through and making changes. The show of maturity in DEI is making those changes and moving forward as a company. “Are you able to make all the changes? Probably not, but at least you are doing something,” Vizcardo said.Carrie Snider is a Phoenix-based journalist and marketing copywriter.

Carrie Snider | March 22, 2024

Workspace Leadership: The Powerful Role of Place in Worker Well-Being and Productivity

“Everybody's familiar with the traditional ways of keeping employees happy, right?” KHOU 11 anchor and reporter Shern-Min Chow inquired. “Their salary, bonuses, benefits, health insurance. But you have some pretty interesting ideas just about our workspace in general.”“Any place we go, whether that is a sacred space, a shared space, or a private space – there are certain features that affect our needs in the workplace,” responded Dr. Alan Witt during a fireside chat at From Day One’s Houston conference.Witt, who regularly works with environmental psychologists and architects, provided the audience with profound insight into the psychological and physiological impact of the physical place of work on employee satisfaction and productivity.From the colors of the wallpaper to the presence of real (or fake) plants – every detail plays a role in cultivating a particular mood and atmosphere that can improve or hinder employee satisfaction, development, and engagement, he says.As a professor of public affairs, management, leadership, and psychology at the Bauer College of Business, Witt shared the impact of the workplace on engagement, development, and employee mental well-being. Servant Leadership: Surveying Environments for SolutionsServant leadership is a holistic approach to creating a productive workplace. It is a methodology that measures success through employee well-being and development. Servant leaders survey what areas of the workplace impact employee health and productivity to make sustainable improvements.“It's a mindset that a lot of us focused on productivity and achievement don't really have,” Witt said. “But if you treat people as the customer, they will generally respond.”Alan Witt, PhD, Professor of Management & Leadership, Public Policy, and Psychology, C.T. Bauer College of Business, University of Houston was interviewed during the fireside chat in HoustonTraditional leadership measures success based on adherence to employee performance plans, quantified with data analysis. Servant leadership assesses the quality of the employee experience as an indication of success.Servant leaders also assess the physical environment, company culture, and their respective influences on well-being, diversity, equity, and inclusion to identify problems and create solutions to an individual’s personal and professional growth.By replicating the customer-first experience with employees, servant leaders can identify areas of improvement in the physical environment that may boost engagement in ways that traditional leadership and performance plans miss. Physical Elements Conducive to Workplace PerformanceChow and Witt identified several physical elements of a supportive workplace. Crafting an efficient workplace involves considering human psychological and physiological complexities within specific environments.For example, Chow, a news anchor at KHOU-TV, asks Witt for his perspective on the TV channel’s recent move to a new facility without permanent desks. People in the workplace may not like that because it obfuscates their identities with no individually designated spaces, says Witt.“People like to have their space and have their stuff, and they want to make it their own so that they can identify with it and people will recognize it as theirs,” Witt said.He cites UC Berkeley’s Employee Engagement Model, where autonomy and belonging are among the top 12 conscious and subconscious psychological needs that, once met, help improve employee motivation. Chow confirmed this analysis creates more efficiency. After finding the stand-up desk she liked, she remained at the same one for three years.Witt recalls when he asked a colleague what color he should use during a house renovation: “And so I called and said, ‘Please tell me what colors to choose.’ She said, ‘What do you want to experience?’ That's the key phrase that HR folks think about.”When cultivating an engaging workplace, elements that create positive physiological responses are the most sustainable. From a psychological perspective, Witt provided several examples of strategizing a workspace supporting employee mental well-being like assessing indoor air quality for mold, airflow, and temperature control. Buildings made of up to no more than 50% light wood rather than dark wood elicit a positive physiological impact and blue, green, and white encourage more focus and positive social engagement and interactions, says Witt.The unique set-up of a workplace environment plays a critical role in creating an atmosphere and behavioral dynamic that influences employees to feel more belonging and at ease or isolated and restricted.When it comes to cost-efficient solutions, Witt believes more studies are needed to determine the extent to which individuals can have control over their spaces in the workplace to support their needs without disrupting the workflow of other employees.Stephanie Reed is a freelance news, marketing, and content writer. Much of her work features small business owners throughout diverse industries. She is passionate about promoting small, ethical, and eco-conscious businesses. 

Stephanie Reed | March 19, 2024