A Toolkit for Bringing Generations Together in the Workplace

BY Michael Stahl | July 21, 2022

When it comes to generational stereotypes in workplace culture, unfortunately, there’s something for everyone. They go like this: Boomers are set in their ways and don’t do tech (actually, not so), while Millennials are the “participation trophy” generation, in need of constant praise (it’s more complicated than that). The youngest generation in the workforce today, Gen Z, has already been labeled too. They’re supposedly hooked on technology and too quick to question everyone else’s values (from their perspective, there’s no time to lose).

Like all stereotypes, those of the ageist variety are not only off-base, if they’re brought into the workplace they can undermine a company’s team spirit. Yet age discrimination remains an under-discussed aspect of the workplace conversation on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). This presents an opportunity for positive change, since age-inclusive teams have been shown to have advantages in terms of innovation and stability.

A fresh idea for fostering teamwork among generations is the intergenerational employee-resource group (ERG). While ERGs have long been established to provide support and community for members of marginalized groups and their allies, an ERG that mixes the generations offers a new dynamic. To help employers form and foster such groups, AARP has crafted an Intergenerational ERG Toolkit to bring workers together to confront ageist stereotypes and create new bonds among workers of different generations and life experiences.

“There are as many as five generations in the workforce now and, given demographic trends of increased longevity and lower birth rates, it’s likely that the workforce is going to remain multi-generationally diverse for the foreseeable future,” said Heather Tinsley-Fix, senior advisor of financial resilience at AARP. “One of the ways leaders can add age to their DEI thinking and be more age inclusive is to encourage generations to interact with each other, rather than remain in silos.”

When multi-generational workers get to know each other better, ageist thinking–which can have a range of negative effects on workers, including an erosion of self-confidence–will likely dissipate. Stereotypes are attached to both young and experienced workers, and they’re often erroneously believed by the very employees they target.

How Assumptions Can Be Contagious

The downloadable, 104-page toolkit provides a host of insights

“[W]hat might really matter at work are not actual differences between generations, but people’s beliefs that these differences exist,” said Harvard Business Review in a 2019 story about the effects generational differences have on organizations. “These beliefs can get in the way of how people collaborate with their colleagues, and have troubling implications for how we people are managed and trained.”

“Young people think, ‘I’m being looked at as flighty or I want a medal all the time because I’m a Millennial,’” Tinsley-Fix said. “Then you survey their colleagues and they don’t think that way of them. Older workers think, ‘They probably think I’m slow and I’m tech-illiterate,’ and then you ask the younger co-workers and they don’t think that.”

Once those ageist stereotypes that may exist in a company are broken down, thanks to greater interactivity between workers of multiple generations, a more inclusive culture can be hatched. And when organizations have multi-generational workers safely and comfortably engaging with each other, Tinsley-Fix said, “you can really unleash the power of this mix of ages.”

“For a multigenerational workforce and consumer base,” Tinsley-Fix continued, “that might mean achieving successful mentoring and knowledge transfer, or capturing the $8.3 trillion 50-plus market.” (Statistics like those might help explain why intergenerational ERGs are catching on in corporations.)

The Intergenerational ERG Toolkit leverages research conducted over several years by AARP, with partners including the World Economic Forum and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development contributing data and insights. The result is a highly informative publication, with background supporting age-diversification company benefits, step-by-step instructions on how to build intergenerational ERGs–or enhance those perhaps already established in a company–and tips for optimizing their effectiveness.

The Benefits for Corporations

Tinsley-Fix believes the toolkit, which she helped produce, is coming at just the right time for corporations seeking solutions to many contemporary issues. DEI efforts focused particularly on age can prove fruitful. “The global skills shortage, compounded by a relentless war for talent, are growing threats to an organization’s business continuity,” Tinsley-Fix said. “It can be easy for business leaders to fall into survival mode and view DEI initiatives as non-essential investments. However, studies show an age-inclusive workforce reduces turnover, increases profitability and boosts productivity.”

She points to a section in the toolkit outlining why a “future-forward” approach is critical in building intergenerational ERGs. There’s also a test leaders can take to see whether or not they’ve adopted such a disposition. One page provides a list of actions leaders can take to make sure they’re thinking in a “future-forward” manner, while trusting the employees who are building out an intergenerational ERG. Leaders should ask for honest feedback, the toolkit says, and encourage workers to have both “fixed and growth mindsets.” Among other steps, leaders should also ask for help when needed and be truly willing to learn from others, even if that means altering “what you think and how you view your surroundings.”

The same section features a chart illustrating the ways companies have pursued goal achievement through ERGs in the past versus what a future-forward leadership group might consider. For example, in the past, ERGs may have “led” other workers, but today and going forward they should “empower” their colleagues. Beforehand, there may have been “mentor matching” established by ERGs; in the future, they should perhaps “sponsor success.” And instead of “measuring employee engagement,” looking ahead, ERGs should “welcome workplace wellness.”

Mentoring Across Generations

Heather Tinsley-Fix, senior advisor of financial resilience at AARP(Photo courtesy of AARP)

Companies have historically used ERGs to solve certain business challenges, such as expanding into a new market. But these teams can make many different kinds of contributions and, as Tinsley-Fix said, in an intergenerational setting they can profoundly spur what she calls “bi-directional mentoring.”

“ERGs can enable those connections between generations so that older workers can learn from younger workers,” Tinsley-Fix said, “and younger workers can be mentored in, among other things, the soft skills and professionalism that older workers have established over longer stretches of time.”

Even companies that already have age-focused DEI initiatives underway can expand their methods. If there are already-established young professional ERGs as well as experienced employee ERGs in an organization, the AARP publication explains how to get them working together. They can be “expanded, with a broader umbrella that includes all employees interested in building an age-inclusive workplace–regardless of their age or generation,” according to the toolkit. “The work challenges and professional development experiences can be similar no matter the employee’s, age so that the same ERG support network can benefit all.”

While other areas of consideration may garner greater attention in DEI thinking on the part of leaders, there are a host of good reasons to embrace age diversity and inclusion as well. It offers its own share of company benefits, and the policies derived from a successfully age-integrated company will help sustain worker output and other positive outcomes long into the future.

“Research tells us that the presence of older workers on teams in an inclusive environment will increase that team’s productivity,” Tinsley-Fix said. “It’ll increase the quality of their outputs. So intergenerational teams are a good thing for business–full stop.”

Editor’s note: From Day One thanks our partner who sponsored this story, AARP.

Michael Stahl is a New York City-based freelance journalist, writer, and editor. You can read more of his work at MichaelStahlWrites.com, follow him on Twitter @MichaelRStahl, and order his first book, the autobiography of Major League Baseball pitcher Bartolo Colón, at Abrams Books.


RELATED STORIES

Sharing Their Truths: Working Parents Reveal the Benefits That Matter Most

Each year, HR leaders ask themselves: What benefits do my employees want? And what will provide me the most ROI? But many are left without answers.In a recent survey of 2,000 working parents conducted by Ovia Health, 62% said that their employers are not family friendly enough.The need for family friendly benefits is clear. Additionally, 94% said family benefits are a top priority and 73% said they would consider making a lateral move to another organization that offered better benefits and a family-friendly culture.In a From Day One webinar, Corrinne Hobbs, general manager and vice president, employer market organization at Ovia Health, discussed the results of the survey. Hobbs offered insight on current benefits offerings, where more support is needed, and what matters most to employees. Family Benefits That Match Today’s Culture“Women’s health benefits are one of the fastest growing segments within healthcare,” Hobbs said.  This is due to changing circumstances during and post-pandemic as more and more workers experienced shifting work-life balance due to hybrid schedules. It’s also due to the increasing range of types of families that need to be accounted for as lifestyles become more diverse. In this current marketplace, “employees have more control and more power than they have had in the past,” said moderator Siobhan O’Connor, chief content officer at Atria Institute. Therefore, it’s even more critical that employers make sure these specific needs are being served.While most companies do offer some family benefits, Hobbs says, there is often a disconnect between perceived needs and actual needs of employees. “There’s a strong push for employees to have better fertility benefits in their workplace. And 38% of respondents said that they’re looking for their employer to provide alternate family planning support,” Hobbs said. This is especially true with more and more single by choice or LGBTQIA+ parents in the workforce, and an overall trend of people waiting until later in life to have children. Unfortunately, many workplaces do not offer benefits to cover the costs of these services, which can be exorbitant.Siobhan O'Connor of Atria Institute interviewed Corrinne Hobbs of Ovia Health during the webinar on family-friendly benefits (photo by From Day One)Incorporating these benefits helps build an overall inclusive corporate culture and can be a way to help retain senior level female employees. Additionally, 83% of respondents said that perimenopausal or menopausal symptoms affect their ability to work, but only 1% receive benefits to help with those symptoms, says Hobbs. In order to “make sure that whatever you’re providing is equitable and inclusive all around,” a diverse range of age and gender must also be factors incorporated into a comprehensive benefits plan.Providing Better Family BenefitsWith family benefits top of mind for employees, Hobbs says there is a clear way forward for organizations looking to provide better care. The most important, according to respondents, is family leave. Hobbs advises: “Make sure that it’s paid, that it’s for at least four months, that it’s inclusive to both parents and that you don’t have to dip into your sick leave or your PTO before taking leave. That is a stress factor for many.” And employers must account for alternate pathways to parenthood, such as adoption, which might entail different costs or timeframes, she says.Hobbs says employers should not only plan for parental leave, but also for parental return. One way to do this is by setting up a return-to-work program to make it easier for parents to re-enter the workforce, noting that it’s a smarter investment than having to endure the cost of hiring someone new. Gradual part-time schedules can ease the burden on stressed parents, as can accommodating PTO policies, flex time, and hybrid or work from home options.Additionally, managers need to be prepped on how to work with returning parents. “A manager training program to ensure a family friendly workplace and ensure that people are able to bring their full selves to work without fear of repercussions is critical,” Hobbs said. ERG support groups can also provide a sense of community support within the workplace.Incorporating Digital Healthcare and AdvocacyOvia Health uses predictive analytics to power millions of members’ care and engagement with their health. Such apps can help provide crucial education about health symptoms, Hobbs says. For example, 85% of respondents said they don’t know much about menopause and how it may affect their performance. Ovia can help fill that gap through online resources, and also provide peer support groups. “We have a community wall where people with uteruses can talk about symptoms together and really feel a sense of community and commonality with others who are going through some of the [same] things,” Hobbs said. Finally, Ovia can also match employees with proper treatment.Using health assessments and surveys, Ovia gets to know its users and can provide highly personalized information to current, expecting, or potential parents. Health alerts will pop up based on users’ reported symptoms, and the app even provides proactive healthcare outreach to guide users through any bumps on their fertility journey.“Digital solutions offer round the clock access, education, and opportunities to really delve deeper into topics,” Hobbs said. “And they also come with advocacy, helping you navigate and understand these complex situations.” The app accounts for a wide variety of families and lifestyles, helping employers provide better care to a diverse workforce. “We have 50+ personalized clinical pathways and programs to support women and families, and then we personalize the experience for each member based on the dynamic health assessments and digital symptom report,” Hobbs said, describing the data-driven service as “person-centered care.”Hobbs says that while women have increasingly reached the upper echelons of the corporate world in recent years, women’s participation in the labor market is currently at a 33-year low. Having a family-friendly workplace can help ensure talented women stay on. “It costs upwards of $75,000 to replace an employee,” Hobbs said. By offering a diverse suite of benefits companies can retain top talent, encourage a more diverse workforce, and save money in the process.Editor's note: From Day One thanks our partner, Ovia Health, for sponsoring this webinar. Katie Chambers is a freelance writer and award-winning communications executive with a lifelong commitment to supporting artists and advocating for inclusion. Her work has been seen in HuffPost and several printed essay collections, among others, and she has appeared on Cheddar News, iWomanTV, and CBS New York.

Katie Chambers | April 10, 2024

How to Measure Employee Engagement and Spot Disengagement

When we think about engagement, we think about all of the different ways that we track engagement consciously and subconsciously. In some ways, we track engagement by just realizing things, like who’s on camera during meetings online, who has a green dot next to their name, and who has a yellow dot next to their name. These are all of the different ways to subconsciously track engagement, but there are biases in each observation because context is key. Just because a person is off camera doesn’t mean they’re less engaged. They might be in a crowded spot or have a background that’s distracting, so they’ve elected to be off-camera. Or maybe their WiFi just isn’t as strong as it needs to be on that particular day.Regardless of the industry or nature of business, maintaining a high level of team productivity is crucial, and disengagement can be a significant obstacle. Learning to recognize the signs of employee disengagement early is key to preventing its negative impact. In a recent From Day One webinar led by ActivTrak colleagues, Gabriella Mauch, VP of Productivity Lab, and Javier Aldrete, SVP of product, the speakers discussed how boosting self-awareness and manager coaching can help address disengagement before employees check out.Gabriela Mauch, pictured, led the webinar alongside colleague Javier Aldrete (company photo)We’re making all these subconscious assumptions about engagement because we know that engagement leads to great results, says Mauch. But disengagement, on the flip side, leads to harmful attrition. As such, it’s important that we find better ways to track engagement so that we can drive to a healthy work environment. Mauch shares that only 23% of employees are fully engaged in their work, leaving over 75% of employees at risk of disengagement. This can cost organizations a significant amount of money, both from an attrition standpoint, a knowledge management standpoint, and the productivity they’re not necessarily getting out of their business. The benefit of addressing employee disengagement is the ability to get a better return on workforce investments. Organizations can see up to 40% improvement in employee churn and burnout rates, plus an opportunity to gain 15% to 25% in productivity when disengagement is addressed effectively, says Mauch. “So often, disengagement and quiet quitting is a function of that individual not being properly aligned to their work, not being properly coached by their manager, or not being properly guided by their leadership team,” said Mauch. It’s  important to learn how to use insights to better inform leaders, managers, and individuals to be more thoughtful about productivity and more engaged in the work being done. As such, it’s important to have measurable indicators into our work environment. This means understanding when we have individuals performing with low focus, low working hours, and perhaps very passive participation. It doesn’t necessarily mean that the individual doesn't want to be working. Instead, there’s an opportunity to coach and guide the employee to work the right way, on the right things, at the right time. Mauch encourages employers to be thoughtful about employee behavior as a helpful indicator of engagement. This means observing things like people coming into the office, badging in, and leaving two hours later merely to show their faces. This could be because while they are expected to be in office, they might actually be more productive at home. The final thing to note is whether or not employees are making the impact you expect them to be making. Here are some questions to ask: Are they putting in the productivity that you would expect? Are you getting the output that you expect to earn, and are you ultimately getting the revenue that you would expect? By collecting insights on an ongoing basis, you can gain a level of understanding of engagement on an ongoing basis. Additionally, leaders need to identify the factors that are contributing to employee disengagement and quiet quitting in their particular context, as well as invest in measures to improve them.Editor's note: From Day One thanks our partner, ActivTrak, for sponsoring this webinar. Keren's love for words saw her transition from a corporate employee into a freelance writer during the pandemic. When she is not at her desk whipping up compelling narratives and sipping on endless cups of coffee, you can find her curled up with a book, playing with her dog, or pottering about in the garden.

Keren Dinkin | April 09, 2024

The Gender Penalty: Addressing Workplace Inequity

Studies show that despite recent movements for equal pay, no significant gender pay gap has been made in the last two decades. Women are still earning less than men, with some variance as high as 22%.But the discrimination extends far beyond just the pay gap: from childbirth to menopause, women are also discriminated against for their life choices and in some cases, life stages, with  42% of working women reporting facing gender discrimination at their workplace.In a From Day One webinar, Lydia Dishman, senior editor of growth and engagement at Fast Company, moderated a discussion among women in roles of leadership on how to achieve equality in the workplace.Studies show that women are 41% more likely to experience toxic workplace culture than men, underlining the need for a culture revamp in companies.According to recent research, one in three working parents stated they lacked access to a reliable workplace lactation location. The disparity shows that offering solutions is far more than checking off boxes, Teresa Hopke, CEO of Talking Talent said.“Having a pumping room is a checkbox. So even if we check the box and we get the right rooms and accommodations for people, that’s not going to move the needle in the way that we need to in terms of the systemic change that needs to take place,” Hopke said.For change, both workers and leaders need to be actively working to create the shift that they need, Hopke says.Speakers from Talking Talent and KPMG joined moderated Lydia Dishman in a discussion about the role of gender in the workplace (photo by From Day One)“There is some hard work that organizations need to do to create the right culture with the right mindsets, behaviors, conditions, and structures that will support women as they advance through their careers,” Hopke said. “There is also work that women need to do to articulate their needs and not suffer in silence when the load gets too hard.”When asked about allyship, seventy-seven percent of white employees consider themselves allies to women of color. However, far fewer replied to actively participating in allyship, with only 39 percent stating they confront discrimination when they see it, and 21 percent stating they advocate for new opportunities for women of color.“If you are not taking any of those ally actions regularly, you’re not moving things forward in a positive way,” Marcee Harris Schwartz, director of diversity, equity, and inclusion at KPMG, said. “We have to think about how we activate allyship whether that’s taking someone under your wing who comes from a different background or experiences so that it has an impact.”When asked about biases at work, 83% of employees stated that the biases they experienced were subtle and indirect. In one work case, Renu Sachdeva, head of client solutions at Talking Talent, found this to be true.“We asked leaders to pick people to actively sponsor who belonged to these identity groups. And when the results came back in, we found a majority of them had selected white women, the next most selected group was men of color, and the least selected group was women of color,” Sachdeva said.The findings weren’t surprising, Sachdeva says. Research has found that white people demonstrate a clear bias for other white people, affecting workplace processes from hiring to promotion. Challenging biases is key to moving allyship in the right direction, Sachdeva said.“If you’re talking about the majority, corporate America is usually white men in most organizations, so the highest level of comfort tends to be with white women because there’s a relational aspect to it,” Sachdeva said. “But with intentionality, we need to consciously choose to connect with [different] people to mentor, sponsor or be an ally to because that’s usually the group that gets the most overlooked and left behind.”Editor’s note: From Day One thanks our partner, Talking Talent, for sponsoring this webinar.Wanly Chen is a writer and poet based in New York City.

Wanly Chen | April 08, 2024